Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

RenaissanceBear t1_iwzqiw4 wrote

Zero chance I ever let an employer have access to my brain data.

220

twasjc t1_ix1r6gr wrote

Their AIs already have access to it whether you know it or not. Remote Neural monitoring has exists since the 80s.

−25

stage_directions t1_ix1vefp wrote

I’m a neurophysiologist. Point me at your evidence and I’ll tell you if it’s legit.

24

twasjc t1_ix1wtu0 wrote

https://patents.google.com/patent/US3951134A/en

​

I work with it every day. It's more than legit

−21

stage_directions t1_ix26n2s wrote

No, you don't. And no, it isn't.

But let's play.

What's your noise floor in the gamma band at the finest spatial resolution you can achieve, and what is that resolution?

What is the most prominent source of noise in the data you collect?

Typically, to achieve measurable retransmission of RF waves you need to get a lot of particles spin-aligned, otherwise the fields generated by their randomly distributed spins cancel each other out. How do you overcome this without imposing an incredibly strong field? Typically the field required is strong enough to rip incompatible implants straight out of the body, and generating it requires the use of superconductors - and neither of these things would likely go unnoticed by those being measured.

...I've just got so many questions for you, but will leave you these three to see if you can/will actually play ball.

28

snoo135337842 t1_ix2gbb7 wrote

This dude is likely schizophrenic. He's not going to be able to recognize he's wrong since it's a delusion. Best to just let it be, there's not much you can do from here. Thanks for sharing your insights though

11

Mapafius t1_ix8v0n3 wrote

Perhaps remote neural monitoring is sci-fi thing but I suppose big tech companies use insights and methodologies from neural sciences in their analysis of human behavior based on other types of monitoring.

1

glowcubr t1_ix20btq wrote

Is this in widespread use?

0