Submitted by filosoful t3_yxm3fo in Futurology
TjW0569 t1_iwqltod wrote
Reply to comment by Alis451 in Overhyping hydrogen as a fuel risks endangering net-zero goals by filosoful
Works pretty good if you bind it with some carbon.
CHRLZ_IIIM t1_iwqzlkl wrote
Hydrocarbons how come we never thought of that
TjW0569 t1_iwr1lvm wrote
If only there were some process that scrubbed the atmosphere of CO2, combined it with hydrogen to make hydrocarbons, and released the oxygen as a gas.
Seems far-fetched, I know.
Phssthp0kThePak t1_iwr9l2x wrote
This is good idea, but what about nitrogen? CO2 is too dilute in the atmosphere. We could use ammonia rather than methane.
TjW0569 t1_iwrq4zi wrote
That sort of reduces to the problem of getting the hydrogen. And the higher energy density of nitrogen compounds is not always a benefit. See Texas City, 1947
Phssthp0kThePak t1_iwrtsdd wrote
Hydrogen from water, or bio material. But, yeah, burning ammonia probably will lead to need for some heavy duty catalytic converters, I bet, to avoid smog from NOx. VW will be like, 'you thought we were bad. Wtf?'.
Splenda t1_iwr1zyd wrote
A pity that we can no longer burn them.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments