Submitted by tawhuac t3_ym3qgj in Futurology
ItsAConspiracy t1_iv54kcy wrote
Reply to comment by grambell789 in As long as incentives are misaligned, it's improbable to achieve change by tawhuac
The most prominent idea is fee-and-dividend. Charge a fixed fee per ton of carbon, and distribute all the money to residents. Everybody gets the same amount. If you emit less carbon than average, you come out ahead.
This way everybody has an incentive to conserve what they can, but most people end up with more money in their pockets. The more important aspect is that all our industries get a massive incentive to decarbonize.
grambell789 t1_iv5e851 wrote
the problem, i think in canada and france, were people in heavily tranportation related work had no alternative way to do transportation except making carbon. that means less transportation is produced and consumed which means they lose their jobs and the checks they got didn't make up for that. I think thats it. I need to look for youtube videos that go into it some more.
ItsAConspiracy t1_iv5gsml wrote
Transitioning to a zero-carbon economy would be a huge change in how we physically do things. I don't think there's any way to do that without some people losing their current jobs. The upside is that civilization doesn't collapse into chaos.
Might be reasonable to put some extra money towards helping out particular groups like that, though.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments