Responsible-Hat5816 OP t1_iuv8hrd wrote
Reply to comment by bladerunner_35 in Want To Live Longer? How Life Extension Industry Will Reboot Health, Wellness and The Economy by Responsible-Hat5816
>You have yet to produce a single credible argument why a life prolonging technology wouldn’t benefit the ultra rich much greater and to the detriment of everyone else.
Because it's more profitable to sell it to everyone than a few select ultra rich.
Plus aging costs us trillions every year. Your non existent argument: "muh I saw a stupid movie!! I coped really well. I like to cope!"
bladerunner_35 t1_iuv8krl wrote
Sorry bud, you already said this almost verbatim.
Try again, please.
Responsible-Hat5816 OP t1_iuvctix wrote
Βecause I'm responding to the same comments, essentially.
bladerunner_35 t1_iuvfe42 wrote
You’re not tho.
I’ve given you several examples of healthcare inequalities if today.
You haven’t given a single example if why this technology would be different beyond that it would be cost-effective.
I’ll ask again. Why would this be universally provided when basic medicine and healthcare isn’t provided today?
Our current economical system isn’t cost-effective beyond the red line of a single corporation. Enormous resources are wasted because of this.
Come on now mate, you’re making us both look bad. You can do better. I am sure there is a point in there somewhere if you can only form it into a coherent thought.
Responsible-Hat5816 OP t1_iuvglux wrote
None of these examples explain why only the ultra wealthy would get this.
It makes economic sense to fund and subsidize, just like vaccines.
>We show that a slowdown in aging that increases life expectancy by 1 year is worth US$38 trillion, and by 10 years, US$367 trillion. Ultimately, the more progress that is made in improving how we age, the greater the value of further improvements.
>
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-021-00080-0
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments