Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

warplants t1_itt931u wrote

Reply to comment by throwaway23410689 in NASA announces its unidentified aerial phenomena - A 16-people team — including an astronaut, a space-treaty drafter, a boxer, and several astrobiologists — will soon begin its review of unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP) for NASA research team to examine mysterious sightings. by yourSAS

I read your links, watched the timestamped video for a few minutes. Didn't find a single statement that even remotely approaches support for your assertion.

Maybe you could directly quote which statements you think are most relevant?

2

Ok-Satisfaction1025 t1_ittb6ug wrote

“I’m going to assume your parents are related if you don’t agree with me” LOL.

2

throwaway23410689 t1_ittc34z wrote

Former President Obama

I know you're a bit slower but if you can't come to the conclusion there's more to UAPs than "there's a prosaic explanation" I don't want a reply.

−1

warplants t1_ittddg6 wrote

> there’s footage of objects in the sky and we don’t know what they are

That’s alien disclosure to you?

2

throwaway23410689 t1_ittggum wrote

Obama called them aliens on Instagram yesterday, watch his latest reel. Also they aren't just objects in the sky. They are also seen in our seas(page 9). The USG now classifies them as Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena. Whatever they are, they aren't from here.

−1