samwe5t t1_it8m0tn wrote on October 21, 2022 at 6:52 PM

Reply to comment by symonym7 in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305

Well, yeah, there are a lot of mediocre and bad artists. But there are at least some good artists who produce new ideas. There are no AIs that can do that

bric12 t1_it8weeg wrote on October 21, 2022 at 8:02 PM

I think you're overestimating how creative good artists are. Sure, they have good ideas, but it's very rare that it's ever in a completely new style that's never been seen before, and is also good. You're also underestimating how creative a neural network can be at trying to fulfill constraints.

Humans definitely still have the edge in creativity, I'm just saying the gap is much smaller than you're implying

symonym7 t1_it92ejm wrote on October 21, 2022 at 8:43 PM

Picasso was, well, Picasso because he was constantly working; producing an absurd amount of material and [probably] collecting some form of feedback that modulated his direction. With AI (DAL•E for example) you’ve got thousands+ of human inputs, millions of interpretations, and instant feedback in the form of whichever interpretation the human inputs are choosing.

Good art can provide the illusion of magic, but that didn’t just happen one day - it took literal eons of trial and error and AI’s doing that in, y’know, less than eons.

Krystami t1_it91h64 wrote on October 21, 2022 at 8:36 PM

All ai art I have seen has has the same rendering style despite different art styles and art qualities.

The highest quality pieces have the same rendering as the purposefully lowest quality looking ai art.

There could be a hyper realistic piece, a styled one, anime, Chibi, animal, landscape, etc. it is all rendered the same regardless of style.

What is the default resolution on images without upscaling (which still changes what the image looks like I noticed)

Are there able to be intertwined layers that can be moved around with transparency?