Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Psiweapon t1_it89liu wrote

Reply to comment by Ijustdowhateva in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305

The onus of proof is on your side to explain why in freezing blazes is this a future worth pursuing.

−2

Ijustdowhateva t1_it8gqhm wrote

The ability to instantly create any piece of media you want sounds fun, not to mention its faster and cheaper than having to deal with other people.

6

Psiweapon t1_it8i0fk wrote

Incredibly deep and well studied motivations to base the future of several cultural sectors on, to be sure...

−7

Ijustdowhateva t1_it8ifrd wrote

I could think it's a good idea because it's fun or because it channels chakral spirit energy into pixel form, doesn't matter. This is coming whether you like it or not.

6

Frostivus t1_it8sspn wrote

Technology did not care for artisans with automation. What mattered was the bottom line. Money. Efficiency. Capitalism.

The average joe cared little as long as they got their cheap iPhones. The companies will now get an AI to do the work of millions for the price of a few.

People would cry foul up until they get a new Marvel movie with millions of hours of manpower’s worth of visual effects made only possible with AI. And none of the ‘overworked’ stuff we are already seeing.

There is no pursuit. This is already the direction.

6

Psiweapon t1_it8t6h8 wrote

The dereliction of agency is astonishing

−3

Frostivus t1_it93b9w wrote

You can expend your limited human energy to fight progress, or you can seek to understand it, adapt to it, and then influence it.

But Pandora’s box is open, and if you think we can go back, then the onus is on you to explain why.

5