Submitted by filosoful t3_y7ey3k in Futurology
Prince_Ire t1_isvemuz wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Phantom Forests: Why Ambitious Tree Planting Projects Are Failing by filosoful
Turns out, paying for the lowest bidder doesn't necessarily mean you get quality results.
hatchway t1_isw14n0 wrote
In project management we have a principle that you can generally only prioritize one out of speed, quality, or budget. A good, experienced project team can get you two of them, while a miracle can get you all three.
[deleted] t1_iswsvd9 wrote
[removed]
hatchway t1_isyo60y wrote
Correct! I figure I can accelerate one without risking the others. Accelerating two strongly risks the third.
I'm fairly handy with tools, materials, and software so DIY is my version of "cheap and quality". Still can't be too slow, though, or it risks household tension from too many unfinished tasks (lol)
Bomamanylor t1_isxamra wrote
Procurement attorney here. This is so incredibly true that the government has to actively encourage contracting officers not to issue LPTA (lowest price technically acceptable) solicitations. It was a whole initiative a few years ago.
These contracts can work, and better than running it in-house (using gov’t employees), but you really have to write your contracts carefully.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments