Otherwise-Anxiety-58 t1_istf4lm wrote
It's easy to make such a treaty when space is a far off dream with no clear benefits, except for scientific interest. I don't see it holding up if we get to the point where there is profit to be had.
kolitics t1_isuf4bx wrote
The more we reach of the infinite resources of space, the less there is to fight over.
AugustusClaximus t1_isuiucm wrote
We are already capable of a post scarcity society, but our greed continues to outpace our production capacity. We could give everyone a roof and a full belly, but others might have to do without a 3rd car and a golf membership. I think it’s foolish to think this will change any time soon. I wouldn’t be surprised if we don’t start a war over how the dyson swarms power is allocated in 200 years
m4nu3lf t1_isv7zhs wrote
Isn't it a contradiction to say "we could be in a post scarcity society if we wanted less"?
Btw a lot of wars in modern history were/are also ideologically motivated. War is so destructive today that it's never benefitting either side.
AugustusClaximus t1_isvajbl wrote
I’ll clarify by saying that I think that the concept of post scarcity of society is dubious. There will always be things we find scarce and we will shift our appetites to pursue those things.
Kwelikinz t1_isxswpj wrote
So true! If there becomes any power advantage to be gained, same outcome. Still, I’m hopeful that we can experience a shift in consciousness and practice that would allow peace between all living and non-living things.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments