Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Otherwise-Anxiety-58 t1_istf4lm wrote

It's easy to make such a treaty when space is a far off dream with no clear benefits, except for scientific interest. I don't see it holding up if we get to the point where there is profit to be had.

17

kolitics t1_isuf4bx wrote

The more we reach of the infinite resources of space, the less there is to fight over.

2

AugustusClaximus t1_isuiucm wrote

We are already capable of a post scarcity society, but our greed continues to outpace our production capacity. We could give everyone a roof and a full belly, but others might have to do without a 3rd car and a golf membership. I think it’s foolish to think this will change any time soon. I wouldn’t be surprised if we don’t start a war over how the dyson swarms power is allocated in 200 years

2

m4nu3lf t1_isv7zhs wrote

Isn't it a contradiction to say "we could be in a post scarcity society if we wanted less"?

Btw a lot of wars in modern history were/are also ideologically motivated. War is so destructive today that it's never benefitting either side.

2

AugustusClaximus t1_isvajbl wrote

I’ll clarify by saying that I think that the concept of post scarcity of society is dubious. There will always be things we find scarce and we will shift our appetites to pursue those things.

1

Kwelikinz t1_isxswpj wrote

So true! If there becomes any power advantage to be gained, same outcome. Still, I’m hopeful that we can experience a shift in consciousness and practice that would allow peace between all living and non-living things.

1