MachineGoat t1_is5jxt4 wrote
Reply to comment by ialsoagree in US Federal Reserve sees EV “battery belt” developing as greater than 15 battery manufacturing facilities worth greater than $40 billion are in development in the US by ForHidingSquirrels
All of your points were a comparison of nuclear versus other methods of power generation.
You statements are just like the news, full of fear and doubt to drive a position but without any substance and if examined for more than a few seconds they fall apart.
You voiced a very strong opinion without stating any facts. What was your point if not to drive a position using misleading information?
Misleading is lying.
ialsoagree t1_is5krgn wrote
So you couldn't quote a single thing, got it.
Meanwhile, solar panels and wind turbine blades are recyclable.
Who is recycling nuclear waste again? Or right, no one, it's not recyclable. It's radioactive for tens of thousands of years and requires nuclear plants to keep full time security staff at every plant to prevent terrorists from getting to it.
[deleted] t1_is5l8aj wrote
[removed]
ialsoagree t1_is5mkbp wrote
This is just propaganda from the oil companies, are you a paid shill?
That's not to say wind turbine blades are widely recycled, they aren't, but they can be, and anyone stating otherwise is spreading misinformation and lying.
Further, the toxicity of solar panel production is overstated due to a non-peer reviewed study that reached erroneous conclusions by using deceptive comparisons with spent nuclear fuel.
You can read more about that here:
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/03/clean-energy-facts-belie-common-myths/
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments