Submitted by noelcowardspeaksout t3_y1akde in Futurology
project_apex t1_is0j1b1 wrote
Reply to comment by JaegerDread in UK to build first grid connected Fusion Power plant by noelcowardspeaksout
It is if you replant the trees you use...
JaegerDread t1_is0jb0i wrote
Yes, again, in THEORY it is. But in practice it's just a bureaucratic way to say you are being green on paper. It's about as green as driving a diesel from the 90's but the color is green.
project_apex t1_is0jfzy wrote
No, it's not just in theory. If you get wood from a production forest that you planted and also upkeep then it's renewable. It doesn't add any co2 to the air.
Burning diesel fuel would actually increase co2 in the air.
JaegerDread t1_is0jn27 wrote
Yes, but that doesn't happen. It's just deforestation. Fuck biomass. Solar, wind, geothermal and wave energy are all muuuuuch much better.
project_apex t1_is0jr7v wrote
Got any sources for that claim? Because in EU this is pretty tightly regulated.
Sure solar and wind are better alternative but they have their own drawbacks that biofuels don't have.
tyytus t1_is1b9eg wrote
Earth needs all the old growth forests it can get, which are massive carbon sinks. Wood plantations are replacing them in this scheme; cut-burn-grow60yrs-cut-burn
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments