Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_irx7sgs wrote

Reply to comment by Guerriky in Solar Rollout Rouses Resistance in Europe’s Countryside: Regulations meant to protect green space block the installation of solar panels despite soaring energy prices by CannoliIntoPussy

You think absolutely none of these issues mentioned could’ve been solved if we put money into developing new nuclear technologies? Making them smaller would address most of these issues. Solar from the 90s is a fair comparison to nuclear as the technology has not advanced at all due to political factors.

Also to your 4th point… this is the very same issue with solar as well. Half the time the sun isn’t there so you need to either build batteries or…. Supplement with a different source of power. Additionally, using both solar and nuclear are not mutually exclusive, not sure why you view it this way

0

Guerriky t1_iry1h5d wrote

Because nuclear requires enormous initial investment, it's slow to deploy, tricky to distribute, not easily scalable, still needs to be accumulated (because of too much power, rather than too little), still relies on the economics of a fuel.

If we invest heavily in nuclear what we could invest on renewables, we would reap the profits in twenty years.

And we can't make small reactors; for one, because tech isn't ready yet (despite recent Chinese investments), but also because... Who'd want them in their yards?

Also, since you mentioned it... You'd be amazed how little we progressed in renewable tech in the last 20 years, especially solar... We really sat on our comfy gas for a long time, you know... No real incentives...

2