Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MoobooMagoo t1_irinp56 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Space adverts are now economically viable but potentially dangerous by Soupjoe5

You think the government isn't made of ordinary humans?

Although I understand the point you're trying to make about resources. And yes it would be easier to hack the company, that's literally what I said. I'm not saying it would be easier to build your own satellite uplink and then hack the satellite directly. That'd be stupid. Who would do that? Why would you ever think that was what I meant? That's like if I said "I'm walking to the store" and you got bent out of shape telling me how hard it is to walk on your hands so walking to the store is a dumb idea.

You would obviously hack the company then use their own uplink to send your code to the satellite. And the detectability and traceability of the signal doesn't matter because it's just going to lead them back to the company's uplink.

1

[deleted] t1_iriowrb wrote

Should have made that clear given that your second response to this discussion implied “directly hacking the satellite” rather than hacking the company.

1

MoobooMagoo t1_irj6dhi wrote

"No you can't hack into the satellite directly, but the company is going to have an uplink somewhere and you can hack into that."

I don't know how much more clear I could have been.

1

[deleted] t1_irj74ig wrote

My bad, I meant your second comment, not your second response. Your second comment held zero mention of “hacking the company” but rather the implication of the satellite itself.

1

MoobooMagoo t1_irjktt0 wrote

Oh ok I see what you're saying.

I still stand by my assertion that it should have been obvious that I meant hack the satellite through the company, because the alternative would be silly.

1