RichardsLeftNipple t1_ir72adn wrote
Reply to comment by Hanzo_The_Ninja in Many scientists see fusion as the future of energy – and they're betting big. by filosoful
Solar is going to be a very transformative power source for developing nations. Because it can be bought in small quantities.
While it's less attractive for developed nations because it's still more expensive than fission and coal.
Fusion for developed nations is very attractive. Mostly because it can plug into the already existing infrastructure. The potential is there, which is what makes it attractive.
Also both have the nice feature of reducing hydrocarbon dependency. Which would lead to a more stable economy and not let places like Russia and Saudi Arabia have a gun against your economy's head.
Hanzo_The_Ninja t1_ir74nz6 wrote
It's not actually clear if fusion power will even be viable within any of our lifetimes though -- for example there's supply issues with the necessary tritium, there's problems replicating the breakthroughs, etc. -- so "betting big" on fusion is quite literally gambling on an uncertain technology, at least for now.
CriticalUnit t1_ir9bb6a wrote
> Solar is going to be a very transformative power source for developing nations. Because it can be bought in small quantities.
100% Agree
>While it's less attractive for developed nations because it's still more expensive than fission and coal.
100% wrong. This hasn't been true for a while now. Today solar and wind are often cheaper than even running a fully paid for Coal or nuclear plant.
https://cleantechnica.com/2022/07/21/most-renewables-cheaper-than-cheapest-coal-in-g20/
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments