Submitted by WallStreetDoesntBet t3_xvir6r in Futurology
Aceticon t1_irc3t2u wrote
Reply to comment by creamy_cucumber in EU votes to force all phones to use same charger by 2024 by WallStreetDoesntBet
Elsewhere:
"This paragraph requires items of radio equipment, listed in a new Annex (Part I) added by the proposal, to comply with the charging interface and charging communication protocol described in that new Annex."
There's also a whole bit about the Comission giving itself powers to change the rules for devices which are not charged wirelessly.
You can't just read one bit of a proposal for ammendment without the context of the Directive 2014/53/EU which is the one being ammended and think you found some kind of loophole that nobody else saw.
I mean, you can, but that's just slightly megalomaniac fantasising.
If Apple does try to see if they can go around, I'm sure the courts will be happy to deliberate on whether they are compliant with the ammended Directive 2014/53/EU as whole or not, all the while Apple's phones are blocked from sale in the EU (the way compliance is designed for the Single Market is not having the supplier getting to sell their products whilst its compliance is in dispute as that would open a massive backdoor for the sale of knowingly non-compliant devices during the time it took for things to go through court in the end they would just stop selling having pocketed the money in the meanwhile and start it all over again with a new product).
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments