Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

WallStreetDoesntBet OP t1_iqp3u9h wrote

Social robots have been proposed as a solution for social isolation, and to address the challenges associated with ageing. There are several challenges in producing robots that can realistically mimic the behaviour of humans, so researchers are turning to dogs to check if robots can develop similar bonds with humans.

9

paulfromatlanta t1_iqp8egd wrote

I'd rather have robots based on dogs than on humans. Humans are devious...

39

FuturologyBot t1_iqp8j1j wrote

The following submission statement was provided by /u/WallStreetDoesntBet:


Social robots have been proposed as a solution for social isolation, and to address the challenges associated with ageing. There are several challenges in producing robots that can realistically mimic the behaviour of humans, so researchers are turning to dogs to check if robots can develop similar bonds with humans.


Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/xtc1n7/development_of_social_robots_can_take_cues_from/iqp3u9h/

1

nilogram t1_iqpbgt2 wrote

Can’t get all the emotions of both my pups. I always like to change up the routine to see their newest unique reactions. Flawless everytine

6

LoveThySheeple t1_iqpdtxb wrote

Don't you fucking dare, this crosses every line I can think of. You can replace humans with robots but stay the fuck away from the dogs you sick fucks

2

kittymoma918 t1_iqpdvft wrote

Those seem to be available from Robotix. But not at a low orice yet.

And I don't think that Elon Musk's proposed catgirl robot is happening any time soon!

His poor Optimus is pretty awkward and wobbly at this stage. But at least it has handl ike appendages. Xiaomi' Robotics Cyberone robot has something like clamps instead.

5

capt_yellowbeard t1_iqpfbxs wrote

Imagine what things would be like if developers decided to base social interactions on the behavior of cats instead. That seems… worse.

2

APFernweh t1_iqphkd5 wrote

Or we could abandon this capitalist hellscape and live in bonded, integrated communities. And also adopt rescue dogs.

6

kittymoma918 t1_iqpjl6k wrote

If Robotix gets their act together and lives up to their interview discussion, they might still get a more practical and better orice home companion out on the market first. The owner claims that they are going to incorporate some very basic mobility ,home skill and medical alert assistance into their next generation of A.I. Harmony ptiduction model's.

I don't think that most guys would mind their companion using a self recharging mobility base like the Sophia used to have to get around at home to clean .Make it useful like a Roomba and you're already halfway there.

When a big success moves a level up , someone smaller will be glad to fill that space. Hanson Robotics Sophia is going to be replaced with a new advanced version mass production model, by Machani Robotics , Project RIA.

It's always less expensive and easier to let soneone else do the year's of R&D and engineering to create the top of the line high end product. Then you just have to find a way to make a similar product cheaper and just different enough to not get sued for copyright infringement

1

wjglenn t1_iqpsnfs wrote

If they can make a robot that’s mischievous and toddler-like trouble causing at a level where you’re both pissed and a little proud, I’m sold.

1

kllinzy t1_iqpxopn wrote

Real question does any one at all want this, I feel we are dramatically overestimating the demand for fake social interaction. Maybe someone so old and senile who couldn't tell the difference (or understand it) would appreciate it, but even that feels cruel. If we can't dedicate any time or effort into providing real social interaction for our elderly then it seems like an us problem not a tech problem. Any use case I'm missing?

1

losorik t1_iqqh5fg wrote

I can’t imagine anyone sane choosing a machine-dog over a breathing dog.

2

femmestem t1_iqrtp14 wrote

Use case 1: Trauma cycles. Some older people don't have family in their lives because of their own self-destructive behaviors. I don't think the family owes them anything. However, they still have social needs.

Use case 2: Care giving requires sacrifice. My dad loved and cared for my grandmother as much as he could when her health declined, including legal and financial affairs, when he also had his own wife and kids and full time job. It was a demanding and exhausting situation for him. He loved his mom but still needed a break.

2

kllinzy t1_iqtvbno wrote

I can totally see why people who would be replaced by the robot would want it, I just can't imagine the person interacting with the robot, wanting it. Maybe if they couldn't tell the difference, but that just seems cruel.

I totally agree, it's difficult, and I'm of the opinion that the burden shouldn't fall solely on the family of the elderly person in question. Seems like it should be more of a social obligation. I just don't see how tech can solve this problem, at least not ethically. And your dad sounds like a good dude.

Social interaction with an object isn't social interaction, imo, so this is a hard sell.

1