Well, it's a result based on that lieu, anyway. Which is part of one of the concerns of 'replacing' scholarly workers. That without a continuing body of reliable data, AI will not be able to progress.

I've used it for some similar types of questions. It's good at finding more or less something applicable to what I'm looking for (in legal questions, history, etc). But it seems it's just grabbing what I could find otherwise on Wikipedia and research papers, and making it so I don't have to read through everything to find it. And for giving colored responses that we can interpret. I haven't really been impressed by anything it's said though, the way I am when I listen to a real expert in the subject, and rather it's just good at presenting encyclopedic/textbook info. Have you?