Submitted by [deleted] t3_11oc9co in Futurology
ahivarn t1_jby6zb2 wrote
Reply to comment by mhornberger in What are some good forums for futurology? by [deleted]
Well they are not wrong completely. Technology isn't the solution for social ills. Unless you consider biotechnology modified wheat a solution for Egyptians during pyramids.
mhornberger t1_jby7t2y wrote
Not for social ills like racism, no. But some social ills are due to problems that technology can in principle address. Such as controlled-environment agriculture, cultured meat, cellular agriculture, and other tech incrementally addressing food security and water security, by reducing the amount of arable land and water needed to produce your food. Or by electrification, renewables (and/or nuclear), and BEVs incrementally reducing the problems associated with fossil fuel dependence.
To me pollution is a technology problem. To others it's a social problem. But people are going to way, say, transportation. An ICE Lada burns the same fuel whether it was made in a capitalist auto plant or one under communism. You need to replace the ICE vehicle with better technology. Mass transit exists too, but many people still want or need automobiles. It would be silly to forego electrification until that hypothetical future date when we've changed society so no one wants or needs an automobile.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments