tDANGERb OP t1_jegqpum wrote on March 31, 2023 at 10:07 PM

Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in Chat-GPT use case I thought of that could make a wonderful difference - Social Services by tDANGERb

So you’re takeaway is we shouldnt harass foster parents not that we should protect foster children?

just-a-dreamer- t1_jegryit wrote on March 31, 2023 at 10:16 PM

If you intrude in other people's lifes, there are consequences. I would never give a government agency access to my home with AI technology. So, the pool of foster parents to draw from would tank.

Likewise trucking companies are learning the hard way that drivers value their privacy even more than their paycheck. There is a case to be made that being homeless is better in comparison.

Regardless, all kids from whatever background should get checked in school for signs of abuse. CPS should only get involved with probable cause.

tDANGERb OP t1_jegsb5f wrote on March 31, 2023 at 10:19 PM

A virtual meeting is hardly access to your home. That would be less intrusive than someone actually showing up and walking room to room

just-a-dreamer- t1_jegsuxz wrote on March 31, 2023 at 10:23 PM

An what would a virtual meeting be good for? Give in status reports? People don't like that.

And walking room to room should actually be done from time to time, within reason I think.

tDANGERb OP t1_jegussv wrote on March 31, 2023 at 10:37 PM

All foster homes are supposed to have regularly scheduled visits but it doesn’t happen because Social Services are severely understaffed. ChatGPT could serve as a supplement to that.

just-a-dreamer- t1_jegvhqj wrote on March 31, 2023 at 10:42 PM

Better tax the rich and get the services scaled up. I think there will be many people that look for new careers anyway.

The goal of automation must be redirecting human labor towards better services on quality and quantity eventually.

But without taxing the rich, or bringing down capitalism eventually, it is all pretty pointless anyway.