Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

czl t1_jbcs10i wrote

Reply to comment by volci in A group of researchers has achieved a breakthrough in secure communications by developing an algorithm that conceals sensitive information so effectively that it is impossible to detect that anything has been hidden by thebelsnickle1991

My words above are:

>> Steganography can help security but it is not security.

To that you reply

> Wikipedia disagrees with you… Steganography is a form of security … Via obscurity

Obscurity can help security but it is not security is it? You know better than that to believe that so why do you reply to me with ‘Wikipedia disagrees with you’?

Here is what the wikipedia link you shared says:

>> Whereas cryptography is the practice of protecting the contents of a message alone, steganography is concerned with concealing the fact that a secret message is being sent and its contents.

Concealment can help you avoid detection but concealment does not offer protection does it? If someone has a gun a pile of leaves may conceal you but will it protect you? What do you suppose happens to those who confuse concealment for cover (which does offer protection)?

Do you genuinely not understand the difference between stenography vs cryptography and the different purposes (as Wikipedia explains) they have? Are you being disagreable on purpose to act like a troll? Why then are you being disagreable? What is your purpose?

1