Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

SupremeEscape t1_jed29wi wrote

I used to use software to buy sneakers and the developers would either have AI solvers or captcha bypass built in.

It’s not far reach but I think that would be an invasion of privacy

2

too_damn_fast OP t1_jed42df wrote

Yes, it would be an invasion of privacy. But it's looking more and more like the internet could possibly be filled with AI generated content in a few years and I can't think of an alternative way for businesses and government to authenticate humans.

1

Amazing_Secret7107 t1_jed5vyv wrote

Wasn't the point of captcha to train early image recognition/ai algorithms? We've caught up, if your scenario is going to be true. A new versioning will be required.

2

Imaginary_Passage431 t1_jedcj49 wrote

Captcha already died. Google recaptcha v3 doesnt use captchas anymore. It uses ai to figure out if you are a bot or not.

2

boersc t1_jedct4j wrote

There is already a version of captcha, recaptcha v3, that uses your history instead of those scribbled letters. It's not used much sadly.

1

thehourglasses t1_jedh6lz wrote

TaskRabbit will have a lot more requests for a human to solve a captcha due to “vision impairments”, or whatever the fuck GPT-4 claimed in order to trick the TaskRabbit agent.

1

qrayons t1_jefbaxd wrote

The output of any sensors would be data. Data that an AI could potentially fake. Also the use cases for needing to know with certainty that someone is a human without knowing who they are are pretty limited. Using multi-factor authentication still works for determining who someone is.

1

Futurology-ModTeam t1_jegfvtw wrote

Hi, too_damn_fast. Thanks for contributing. However, your submission was removed from /r/Futurology.


> > Is it possible that one day our interfaces to a computing device such as touchscreen/keyboard/mouse requires some sort of physical verification through the use of some embedded sensors in our fingers/body?


> Rule 10 - We welcome text posts, but could you please ensure they meet our requirements for creating in-depth discussion. If yours is removed for failing to do so, consider reposting again, but with additional detail.

Avoid generalized invitations to discuss frequently discussed topics (Will AI take over the world? Is Chat-GPT good or bad, etc, etc). Instead, aim for discussion with specific topics (with supporting links if possible), and give detail to the ideas about their future implications that you would like to see discussed. If possible articulate multiple aspects of these future implications to encourage high quality discussion.

Submissions with [in-depth] in the title have stricter post length and quality guidelines.

Refer to the subreddit rules, the transparency wiki, or the domain blacklist for more information.

[Message the Mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/Futurology&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/too_damn_fast&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this submission if you feel this was in error.

1