Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

booleanito t1_jds95jk wrote

I think the tech savvy audience can tell the difference, but there is always a subset of population who cannot tell the difference. As long as these companies can capture these unsophisticated audience and turn into a profit, they are all set. As long as their intention is not bad and business is not bad.

2

Susan-stoHelit t1_jdtra6b wrote

I don’t think most will be able to tell. It’s not unsophisticated people - no blaming the audience for being fooled by something that is very nearly indistinguishable from reality.

1

booleanito t1_jdtruk9 wrote

Deepfake detector

There are tons of deep fake detectors

1

OutOfBananaException t1_jdua2l2 wrote

A detector can be used to fine tune the generation until it passes, so you're going to end up with a lot of false positives (never mind how fake a lot of real photos look due to filters, which makes the task more difficult).

1

booleanito t1_jducpjd wrote

It is like any disease test (false positives in covid test), or fake news detection(mistakes in snopes.com) . We are gonna have an arms race between detectors and evaders. It occurs in all areas, deepfake is just one of them.

The current detector uses blood movement to tell if it’s human. Current deepfake technology cannot fake natural episodic blood movement, it takes a long way to go for fake authentic blood movement that is indiscernible to human eyes.

The excerpt from the previous link “”” assessing what makes us human— subtle “blood flow” in the pixels of a video. When our hearts pump blood, our veins change color. These blood flow signals are collected from all over the face and algorithms translate these signals into spatiotemporal maps. “””

2