konichiwa-minna_san t1_j54g3ff wrote
Reply to comment by CryMore36 in India: The Modi Question (2023) - BBC investigates Indian PM Modi's rise in the Hindu Right-Wing stratosphere and deadly Anti-Muslim and Anti-Sikh Politics [00:59:00] by CryMore36
>recent Farmer Protests
Weren't the farm laws against which those protests were affecting all farmers of India? Were those laws applicable only to Sikhs? Weren't farmers from Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh protesting as well? Are farmer leaders like Rakesh Tikait Sikh too?
>and Anti-Sikh rhetoric
Did you read that article? It says:
"The wounds inflicted by the Congress have been opened by the Bharat Jodo Yatra. Whatever happened in 1984 was not just anti-Sikh riots but massacre of innocent people," Punjab BJP Chief Ashwani Sharma said.
The article says BJP is calling out Congress on its anti-Sikh rhetoric. In case you didn't know, Congress is the main opposition party that is against Modi/BJP.
You just googled "anti-Sikh" and posted the first link you came up with, didn't you?
dumbredditer t1_j5ljdby wrote
Sikh prisoners who have completed their sentences have been kept in jail for decades after their sentence periods ended. Indian govt is quiet on it. Why? Because India hates Sikhs and Muslims. Even though Hindus only exist today because of Sikhs
konichiwa-minna_san t1_j5o765a wrote
>Sikh prisoners who have completed their sentences have been kept in jail for decades after their sentence periods ended.
A source would be nice.
>Even though Hindus only exist today because of Sikhs
LMAO. A community that lost most of it's land to Muslims and had to run away to the Indian side of Punjab is the reason why Hindus exist? You sure are smoking some strong stuff. Either way, didn't Bhindranwale go on a killing spree of Hindus in Punjab before he was put down?
dumbredditer t1_j63rh4o wrote
Source: https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/amritsar/release-of-sikh-prisoners-sought-430377
Indian govt keeps releasing rapists and murderers way before they finish their sentences but when it comes to Sikh political prisoners they don't even release them decades after they serve their sentences.
Hinduism only exists because Guru Gobind Singh Ji fought against Hindu conversion to Islam. Hinduism wouldn't exist today if He didn't sacrifice his life and family to protect Hindus.
In addition, India also only got its freedom from British because of the fight put up by Panjabi Sikhs. Go to Andaman Nicobar jail and you can see 95% of the names are Sikh names.
So before you talk more crap about Sikhs just know that India owes everything to them.
konichiwa-minna_san t1_j675vm9 wrote
LMAO. Did you even read that article you linked you dodo?
>The Tamil Nadu and Gujarat Governments released prisoners facing similar cases. We demanded from the Narendra Modi government to release the Sikh prisoners on the same ground
What is this mofo even talking about? It's two separate state governments releasing prisoners from the state prisons. And he wants the PM to release prisoners from Punjab state prison? How would that even work? Do you know that Punjab is a state in India and Modi is not the chief minister of that state and Modi releasing prisoners from a state prison would mean interfering into the autonomy of the states?
Quick question. Do you even know that the chief minister of Punjab is a Sikh from a party that is opposite of Modi? Shouldn't he release the prisoners à la Gujarat and Tamil Nadu?
Reading the article further, it gets even better. Here:
>He urged the Sikhs to beware of the Badal-led Shiromani Akali Dal on their misleading campaign on Sikh prisoners.
>“The Badals labeled Sikhs as terrorists and lodged them in jails during their regime.
ROFL. These Sikhs were put in prison by a very Sikh party. And you are blaming it on India and Modi? What a clown 🤡? What is it with you guys not even reading the articles you link? The other Pakistani guy too did the same thing earlier. Wait a minute? You are the same guy with an alt, aren't you? This level of incompetence is frightening.
>Guru Gobind Singh Ji fought against Hindu conversion to Islam
Ha ha ha 😂. Seriously now. Sikhs never had a reach anywhere beyond Punjab. The only places Sikhs ruled were Pakistani Punjab and Indian Punjab. And look at their Hindu population % now. Hindus exist today because of Marathas, Ahoms, Vijayanagara and many , many Hindu rulers who fought back. A guy who couldn't protect his own sons from being bricked alive, saved Hinduism? Any more jokes like this?
>Go to Andaman Nicobar jail and you can see 95% of the names are Sikh names.
Again. Give me a source. Because every time you try to back up your argument with evidence it simply falls apart since you are too dumb to even read the stuff you link. I am waiting to insult you further for being a complete moron. Entertain me with a source 🤪
I certainly owe you something for making me laugh you clown.
[deleted] t1_j54h8bo wrote
[removed]
CryMore36 OP t1_j54jhv8 wrote
Well we can go down the whole Khalistan rabbithole, but I'm not going to waste my time with shills.
konichiwa-minna_san t1_j54oadu wrote
So, you've got no response to how I've shown you posted a wrong link and you were ignorant about the farmer's protests? What else can we expect from the citizen of a country that harbored bin Laden?
Dude...The Khalistan movement is from the '80s and it started during the Congress govt. How is the BJP related to that? You won't go down that rabbithole because it will simply expose the fact that it was your country that tried and spectacularly failed at propping up that movement.
And I am a shill now? Rich coming from the citizen of a country that is run by the ISI. Don't you have some begging to do? At the end of the day, Modi is treated like a star at any intl. forum, while your current PM actually said that "his investors are his masters". Not to mention that your former PM called Osama a martyr. Even the Talibans are trolling your sorry ass. You guys are a laughing stock. Stop trying too hard.
Cry more like your username says. Still ain't gonna change the fact that you are going bankrupt in a few weeks. Perhaps you can cry harder after you run out of wheat next week.
CryMore36 OP t1_j54pbvc wrote
I haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about?
Are you referring to Pakistan? If so, I couldn't care less about Pakistan or India. They're both led by selfish, narcisttic and corrupt people. This article is about the treatment of people. Not a country.
As for Modi being treated as an "International Star". I hate to break it to you mate, but we live in a very capitalist age in the West. They're only interested on tapping into the Indian Market. The same way they pander to the Chinese, Gulf and Russian Markets. You think Putin, Xi and MBS are "International Stars" for any other reason that money and diplomacy?
You could have a literal monkey in power and the Western Capitalist Markets will roll out the red carpet.
Naive, aren't you.
konichiwa-minna_san t1_j54s0km wrote
Of course I am talking about Pakistan. And of course you have the fullest idea what I am talking about. Not only that, you care deeply about Pakistan. After all every second post from your account is about Pakistan.
The point is that, you were completely wrong about the anti-Sikh rhetoric. You dug a deeper hole when you mentioned Khalistan without even knowing it's a movement from the '80s and BJP has little do with it. Your concern is neither Modi nor BJP. You simply hate India, which I totally understand given how your country's entire existence is based on that. But when you try to criticise India/BJP at least do some research instead of making inane statements about "anti-Sikh" rhetoric. You do not even have enough prudence to at least read the article that you posted. Why do you think you'd have enough knowledge to talk about anything?
As for the very capitalistic age, I hate to break it to you, but we are relevant while you are not. That's what matters. I don't care if we have a monkey in power or if Modi is literal satan himself. We will keep marching forward and that is why I mentioned in my earlier comment that Modi is an intl. star inspite of what he did in 2002. Don't you understand what I am trying to say here? I dgaf if Modi was behind 2002 riots. For me those riots actually showed that jihadist elements cannot burn Hindus in a train and not expect retaliation. At the end of the day, it's been done and dusted and we keep marching forward while you keep imploding because you pander to those same Islamist fundamentalists that caused the Godhra train burning.
Naive if you thought I care about Modi. I care about India. And I care about getting the facts right. And that is why I haven't commented elsewhere on this thread. I only chose to comment when you ignorantly mentioned "anti-Sikh rhetoric"
Anyway keep crying more.
CryMore36 OP t1_j54u6ej wrote
Look mate. You're obviously really upset about this.
I think you should start caring more about the average person in the population rather than the political powerplay from narcistic Politicians.
You're more than welcome to be a card carrying Modi fanboy on the other hand. All the best 👍
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments