Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WellSeasonedUsername t1_j9b8glf wrote

The people who commit gun violence aren’t concerned with the laws.

−6

EarthExile t1_j9b9qm9 wrote

Of course they are. Just imagine if Kyle Rittenhouse had had to acquire his hunting equipment on the black market.

3

WellSeasonedUsername t1_j9bbk2o wrote

Or imagine if Gaige Groesskreutz didn’t illegally carry a pistol to a protest without a permit (expired permit from another state)

1

EarthExile t1_j9bbtok wrote

I'm not familiar with that name, who did they kill?

7

WellSeasonedUsername t1_j9bc7tw wrote

They illegally brought a pistol to a peaceful protest and pointed it at Kyle. To which Kyle responded. If you wanna talk gun laws, why isn’t Gaige in jail for illegally carrying a pistol?

Also, anybody tell this guy it’s illegal to drive through parades?

0

EarthExile t1_j9bdlf8 wrote

That's odd. So the law abiding gun owner killed people, but the criminal didn't. You sure this is helping make your point?

4

WellSeasonedUsername t1_j9bee0s wrote

He shot a person who was illegally carrying after this person point a pistol at him. Timing and context is everything. That’s called self defense. We’ve all seen the videos and the trial. Gaige admitted to committing 3 felonies.

If Gaige had killed Kyle, how do you think that would look to your point?

It would be another criminal committing murder wouldn’t it?

Was Kyle a tool? Yes. A punk? Also yes. Should he have been there? Absolutely not. But don’t ignore the fact that Gaige was illegally carrying a pistol either. Laws are laws!

I know it’s a lot but the last 30 seconds of this will clear things up

1

flatdanny t1_j9bobtz wrote

> Gaige was illegally carrying a pistol

And child Mensa candidate Rottenhouse knew this how?

In the eyes of the participants each"good guy with a gun" thought they were stopping a bad guy with a gun.

Why? because both civilians had guns on the street.

0