Submitted by IndicationOver t3_118aimx in Connecticut
FallGuysStats t1_j9fyi95 wrote
Putin isn't suicidal. No worries. All grandstanding. Nothing has changed since the start of the war since they stopped inspections at that time anyway.
FirmlyThatGuy t1_j9gd4as wrote
In the very next sentence he said they wouldn’t start testing nuclear weapons again unless the US does. Which we won’t. So it’s just him tossing red meat to the nationalists.
Viceversa10 t1_j9h1mmn wrote
He also said he wasn't going to invade Ukraine.
StevieMac97 t1_j9g3qvd wrote
I've read reports that suggested Putin is sick and it's terminal.
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j9gyehe wrote
No matter of suicide.
Russia can use a limited number of nukes without fear of nuclear reprisal, in my opinion, because Russia doesn't care if tens of millions of its citizens die, so they get some tactical nuclear first strikes as freebies.
The reprisal by the west is the matter of suicide. Russia has the Perimeter dead hand deterrent system, by which a full scale nuclear attack on Russia, whether retaliatory or first-strike, triggers an automated full scale response.
So if Russia nukes Kiev to reverse the tide in Ukraine, and the west responds by nuking a couple Russian cities, that's great for Russia because they get to keep Ukraine and they brought the west to heel. If the west retaliates, it will only be a limited strike, which, again, Russia will readily accept, if it gets it something as prized as Ukraine.
There is zero chance Russia launches a first strike against the continental US. Russia likes to say it has the world's most advanced nuclear delivery system, with its hypersonic nuclear cluster bombs, but that's useless against the US unless Russia could get all our subs in one fell swoop, too, which it can't.
I assume the US has cyber warfare and space weaponry at its disposal that could prevent Russia from launching or that could neutralize incoming missiles, hypersonic or not. Obviously such capabilities are top secret and I'm only speculating.
FallGuysStats t1_j9h00aw wrote
There are so many wrong takes that it's hard to respond to this but I will try.
They do care about their citizens.
There would be consequences for their use which is why they cannot use them.
Us nuking multiple of their cities is not "great for them".
There is zero chance we can prevent them from launching and I give it around a 2% chance to shoot down any incoming nuke. They are mirvs with decoys built to saturate defenses.
Once again, none of this can be used because of MAD. Even if Putin gives the orders I highly doubt they would be followed as it's MADness.
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j9h3fy8 wrote
>They do care about their citizens.
Omg, you've been in a coma for the last year and just woke up. Let me fill you in on what's been happening to fighting age men in Russia and how little the oligarchs in charge of the country care about the people in it. Lol. What a joke.
>There would be consequences for their use which is why they cannot use them.
What are these great consequences that would punish Russia for using nukes, but not deter them from using in the first place?
>Us nuking multiple of their cities is not "great for them".
No of course it's not great. I meant the sarcastic kind of great. Again, because more than they care about a few cities, they care about their position as a world power. If they use them, they obviously think it will lead to a better position for Russia, despite what would happen to a few of their cities.
>There is zero chance we can prevent them from launching and I give it around a 2% chance to shoot down any incoming nuke. They are mirvs with decoys built to saturate defenses.
You don't know the limits of our defensive systems and I don't either. That's why I said I assume.
>Once again, none of this can be used because of MAD. Even if Putin gives the orders I highly doubt they would be followed as it's MADness.
Perimeter is automatic (that means it doesn't need an order).
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments