Submitted by poliscijunki t3_z0lbp9 in Connecticut
giant_toad42 t1_ix9mosz wrote
Reply to comment by Barrayaran in Democrat Chris Poulos Won His Connecticut House Race by a Single Vote by poliscijunki
I am fiscially conservative - and my definition of that is - when I expend revenue it must go to something I get a return on. It also means acting ethically and responsibly with the money of the people of the United States.
It's a misconception that "fiscially conservative" equals "no social spending at all". I see social spending as an investment and I demand to see a return on investment. If there is no return, there is no spending - programs should do quantifiable good.
I am willing to pay for free college - for students who take college seriously. Those who do not succeed should be quickly removed from classes and pushed into vocational programs. ( I know a load of very well-to-do plumbers, landscapers, and electricians. )
I am willing to support SNAP/Rent subsidy.
I am not willing to support no-strings-attached SNAP/Rent subsidy for healthy people capable of working.
I believe laziness is real and should not be subsidized.
I do not believe people who are of working age and are "out of the workforce" should be excluded from unemployment numbers.
I believe teachers should be paid more, and pre-k/childcare should be heavily subsidized.
I believe tax excessive loopholes for corporations are irresponsible.
I support a global (worldwide) minimum corporate tax.
I am very willing to spend on infrastructure and reliable high capacity public transit ( EG: bringing back light rail. )
I am willing to allow familes on state aid to receive a graduated standard of living based benefit vs income-based benefit with a hard cut-off.
I am not willing to increase welfare cash benefit / discretionary spend, nor do I support "UBI".
I believe politicians who abuse their power for profit should be prosecuted. ( This includes people on both sides. )
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments