Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ctoffroad t1_itznhi9 wrote

Thank all the progressive prosecutors and law makers that want to socialy experiment with the legal system. Can think of them everytime another innocent victim randomly gets assaulted in the street or pushed into a train track with a criminal that was just let out on a no bail release. The defund movement didn't work out and now they are just going to let all the violent criminal out. As much as I'd rather not live in Bible thumping state down south I'd rather have a state that takes crime seriously and supports law enforcement.

−9

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_itznvj1 wrote

What the fuck are you talking about? This guy was able to post bail three times in the past.

Stop with the fucking politics. There's a bigger problem here. Doesn't matter what side you are on .

20

Ctoffroad t1_iu07v15 wrote

That's the point!!! why was he able to post bail three times? What do you think because he is so convincing or charming-lmao

No it is because of whatever progressive lenient DA and judge and the current laws!! If you wanna stick ur head in the sand and not face the facts because it goes against your idealistic views then go ahead...

And i am very progressive on many things. I am pro choice, very pro enviroment, equal rights etc. But crime I am very conservative because I want my family safe! I don't want a family member being assaulted or raped because the laws are pro-criminal as they are right now and some repeat violent offender is not locked up! Which is happening nonestop right now because we are doing this new social experiment that is clearly not working.

You know you don't have to think one way or another and be just democrat or conservative on every view as the politicians want. You can think for yourself thats still allowed.

3

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu08vxu wrote

Yeah thats my issue. Thanks for repeating it...m

1

Ctoffroad t1_iu0c6wk wrote

Sorry man but after you throw out the f bomb a few times in such a outrage to my comment I felt I should reexplain my thoughts.

−2

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu0cpgh wrote

While I should be thankful that this guy was taken into custody, and no one was hurt, I am a bit angered at the possibility this guy can go on a rampage and potentially hurt the victim more.

Legislators did pass Jennifer Law last year. But its not enough in my opinion. And other users have brought up good points (custody battles, he-said/she-said, etc). But any reasonable guy would know not to violate a protective/restraining order. This guy has done it three times, and its concerning.

Ill apologize my vulgarity. I wont apologize for avoiding making this a political statement. You and I both acknowledge a potential flaw. lets address it with our legislators.

1

Ctoffroad t1_iu0edpo wrote

I apprecite the apology thank you. The reality is that it is a political issue right now so yeah where else should we talk about it? And why would we just address only with legislators and not discuss it on a public forum where the current topic is about a criminal that was let lose? Again i urge to do some research as to what is happening right now with the current pro criminal movement and the many procriminal laws that are getting made everyday in progressive areas of the country. This isn't a isolated incident based on laws only with protective/restraining orders. This is a current movement that is very much procriminal view point currently. And i agree lets address it with legislators that if you are for keeping violent criminals locked and against the current progressive movement putting criminals rights over the safety of victims.

1

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu0famq wrote

Fine. you got me. politicians make laws. Domestic abuse was addressed with Jennifers law. But why wasn't it addressed here?

Ive done research on it. I have reviewed what they were pushing (shifting from throw them in jail to providing social safety nets). I do agree with aspects of it. But this doesn't apply here. This isn't some dude from Bridgeport who was raised without a father. This is an educated male, who is well off in his $10,000 a month apartment in an affluent neighborhood. This can potentially be a repeat of Jennifer Dulos. It needs to stop.

0

Knineteen t1_itzxxxa wrote

Who is setting bail then?

And how have you come to the conclusion that the penalties handed down for his prior convictions were just and fair?

−1

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_itzyrod wrote

On the contrary. I think after the second time this should have been handled swiftly. Stop allowing perps to continually violate protective orders....

4

Knineteen t1_itzz3lo wrote

I don’t think you answered either of my questions.

You can’t chastise someone for making it political while simultaneously providing absolutely no evidence of your own that it ISN’T political.

0

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu026mg wrote

Look up the court records. I don't know who sets bail. All I know is this dude has continously violates a protective order, allegedly assaulted the victim, and who knows what else, and is still released. It's wrong.

And I got some ass clown saying "vote red" or "it's democrats faults" without providing one shred of evidence.

I'm not making this political. I'm making this right v wrong.

2

Ctoffroad t1_iu09uob wrote

It's happening all over right now with progressive prosecutors and judges!! This isn't some isolated incident!! Look in California, Chicago, NYC at the laws that are all getting made procriminal right now. Hell a cop can no longer chase a criminal in Chicago because of some progressive ideas about being unfair or some other progressive view point! I can give a million other new procriminal laws that all come from progressive law makers. Again do just a little research about what is happening right now. Everything is anti cop full on pro criminal right now.

Trust me it isn't some redneck conservative republican that is making these laws!! Again I know this goes against people's idealistic views that want to see things in a different light but if you wanna see things in color need to face reality.

2

Knineteen t1_iu0ifcq wrote

Enough double talk already. Malloy’s criminal justice reform made it possible for juvenile’s to steal multiple cars in a single night while getting arrested in between each theft.

PS - Malloy was voted into office.

2

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu0iyum wrote

Great. Wonderful. I don't care. Lamont signed Jennifers law. WTF is your point?

You think this guy still deserves to walk. I ask, why? If you had a protective order against you, would you continue to violate it after your first arrest? Would you continue sending harassing messages to the person who doesn't want you to contact them? Would you?

1