Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Gooniefarm t1_jdvqua8 wrote

So put the poor people in the middle of the woods next to a highway? How will they get anywhere without a car? Who's paying to run sewer, water, etc out there?

Makes much more sense to build affordable housing in areas with existing infrastructure and public transportation. Plenty of vacant commercial property and abandoned industrial sites that would fit the purpose as long as the site isn't contaminated.

6

briang71 OP t1_jdvuocg wrote

Well, public transportation ct fastback.

Part of my thought process it to let people live in more natural areas with trees and stuff.

I'm not sure abandoned industrial sites is better than the wood, cost alone... how many things that are abandoned are left in decent shape .. not many.

−1

FFPatrick t1_jdwql1w wrote

The woods sounds great, until you need a 50’ setback for your well, a 50’ set back around your septic and an area for septic reserve and all the sudden you’re back to 2 and 3 acre lots

4