Submitted by stu8163 t3_121ya69 in Connecticut
mynameisnotshamus t1_jdomwml wrote
Reply to comment by AdHistorical7107 in MANDATORY HELMET LAW by stu8163
It’s more the idea of constant surveillance. It’s the principle more than the act and is definitely a precedent setting / slippery slope situation.
AdHistorical7107 t1_jdont1l wrote
Then get off your computer, cell phone, and reddit. Because guess what, they are tracking you...
mynameisnotshamus t1_jdoo0xr wrote
Of course. That’s a horrible argument for this however.
AdHistorical7107 t1_jdookwx wrote
Your argument is constant surveillance. I literally just showed you how you are constantly surveilled and now you say it's a bad argument...
Just... wow....
mynameisnotshamus t1_jdoq5vj wrote
You’re not worth the effort to further explain.
Just…wow…
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments