Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

goliebs t1_ja154zo wrote

Reply to comment by Engineered-Failure in CA funding of Inner Arbor Trust by Sufficient-Item-2750

I think criticizing IAT's management and CA's decision to give it money is warranted on the merits. But implying that this is personally enriching Nina is at best needlessly hyperbolic and seems mean-spirited.

3

Rashaverik t1_ja1kxg0 wrote

I'm quoting you here.

"I think our community would be improved with more people talking personally with one another instead of online."

I tried that once with Josh Friedman. At the time I was an employee of the Village of LR. It ended with Nina and Josh sending the same attorneys the IAT and CA Board have used, to talk with me.

I had written a long response to your comment above, but thought it was best left offline. I'd be more than happy to talk with you over a cup of coffee.

4

goliebs t1_ja1lmve wrote

I stand by that comment - Josh and Nina are among the many people that I had in mind when writing it.

Happy to talk. Will send a DM.

1

Engineered-Failure t1_ja42stf wrote

>seems mean-spirited.

Sorry if it's a bit brash, but I'm not going to be nice about a clear and concise conflict of interest between Basu's positions in both the LR Board and IAT that is already posing a significant threat to CA's financials.

2

goliebs t1_ja46p8h wrote

My point is that you aren’t being clear and concise about the issues. I think it’s perfectly reasonable to clearly criticize Nina’s multiple positions, how that is a conflict of interest, and the financial issues you think it’s causing.

But implying that she is being personally enriched by these things is inaccurate and definitely not clear and concise.

1