Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

goliebs OP t1_j3z7z0v wrote

And consider encouraging your village board to try and recall your CA Rep if you live in Dorsey Search, Oakland Mills, River Hill, Town Center, or Harper's Choice.

And if you live in King's Contrivance, make sure your village board appoints someone who supports Ms. Boyd.

22

rkdwd t1_j3zaart wrote

I can’t wait for Boyd to sue CA for wrongful termination, win a literal lake full of money, and a bunch of CA amenities go away for lack of funding, impacting all residents, and cause dues to increase, while the 10 or whatever board members who caused all of this literally face zero consequences.

26

TheChiefRedditor t1_j426ppi wrote

Im so conflicted. I want to upvote you because you are probably right. But i want to downvote you because of how disgusted the fact you are probably right about this makes me feel. Here's an upvote anyway.

8

krunkley t1_j42hzmm wrote

It sounds like she is choosing to resign rather than being forced try and achieve the impossible, i don't think she is being terminated

3

goliebs OP t1_j42k43v wrote

Maybe but that’s not my interpretation.

She very clearly didn’t “resign.” I believe she is saying “The ‘plan’ the board presented me is a breach of my contract. If you want a president to follow it, find a different president and be prepared for a lawsuit.”

I could be wrong.

5

krunkley t1_j42l8p2 wrote

She is asking to be transitioned out of her position, technically not even saying she is resigning just asking to set up a transition plan. The article even goes into how this is a tactical move so that if the board reversed course she can stay in her position

3