awdrgyjilz t1_jea246g wrote on March 30, 2023 at 2:45 PM

Reply to comment by jakeburdett in Rouse project 2.0 indeed. by hiruy2000

It’s YOUR job to provide a compelling argument. You have not done that. It is not my job to be convinced by your flimsy evidence. I know you think you have a smoking gun. I can assure you that you do not.

Rents move and down all the time, especially in the commercial market.
Inflation riders are preferred but not universal.

There is simply no proof here that Lakey acted in bad faith.

The fact that you’re not open to objective feedback just proves you have underlying motives and aren’t really interested in discovering the truth.

Which is fine (especially since you posted it to a site that promotes conspiracy theories), but just know that your opinion will just keep being marginalized because everyone will continue to not take you seriously.

jakeburdett t1_jea2vhf wrote on March 30, 2023 at 2:50 PM

That’s a fine takeaway to have, though many others do find the evidence presented in this blog to be quite damning, and perhaps the future parts will make you feel the same way

And I’m not sure how you could say I’m not open to feedback, when I’m reading your feedback, and engaging honestly with it

awdrgyjilz t1_jea3798 wrote on March 30, 2023 at 2:53 PM

Yes the “evidence” is quite damning if you’re on the extreme right and already prone to believing in conspiracy theories.

Multiple people have already told you your evidence is flimsy and you continue to post the same things over and over again.

jakeburdett t1_jea3dr1 wrote on March 30, 2023 at 2:54 PM

Giving corporations sweetheart deals to the tune of $1 million+ is quite conservative, actually. Holding corporate greed and corruption accountable is the heart of the modern progressive movement, in fact

awdrgyjilz t1_jea43d3 wrote on March 30, 2023 at 2:59 PM

And again, you have not proven that this was a sweetheart deal without providing comps. Please provide comps.