Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

CookieMonster932 t1_japmll4 wrote

Reply to comment by Stubbedtoe18 in Any development on 108 near Interchange of 29 and 108 (near Centennial Park)? by lnbp2022

People move to these counties because that's where the jobs are. When you restrict development, housing becomes more expensive for everybody. It also just drives people to move to places like Carroll, which increases traffic and leads to even more sprawl.

3

bigjd7 t1_jar491r wrote

I think folks are upset that the developers aren’t in sync with the Rouse vision. Developers aren’t building villages anymore for communities sake. They are doing more houses in smaller areas for more profit.

4

CookieMonster932 t1_jar6bjv wrote

The villages created by Rouse were high density townhomes or even higher density apartments. The successor to Rouse's company Howard Hughes developers want to build these but people are blocking them from doing so thus leading to lower density housing units and a shortage of housing. Rouse's vision was to create communities with a racial and socioeconomic diversity and Howard County has become more and more segregated on both fronts.

4

bigjd7 t1_jard095 wrote

Curious if you have examples of it being more segregated. Maybe the mall development recently. River Hill does not have apartments like Oakland Mills or Long Reach do. We've always thought Columbia was at max capacity. The place OP is referring to is such a weird spot to build.

1

CookieMonster932 t1_jaroq8m wrote

Here's a Baltimore Banner article about increasing segregation. This is a more in depth report about the housing market in HoCo and the rising costs of housing due to lack of supply. Matter of opinion but I think that spot is a good place to put higher density homes. It's right next to the village, and there are vacant storefronts that could use the extra customers.

3

bigjd7 t1_jarvx8i wrote

"Today, Columbia is more diverse than ever. Census figures show the community is 49% white and 28% Black, with fast-growing Asian (13%) and Hispanic or Latino (9%) populations."

Diversity is there....

"The troubling thing we found was an increasing or creeping segregation that appears to be occurring in Columbia with the isolation of African Americans from the white community and decrease of exposure between racial groups in Columbia"

The only land available to build on is far way from Oakland Mills/Long Reach/Hammond/Wilde Lake which supports her claim of whites living farther from African Americans. I think we are in a catch 22. It's a zoning issue.

3

evergreenneedles t1_jbt8cye wrote

It’s a zoning issue but not in the way I think you’re saying. There is zero reason (aside from nimby-ism). There are houses in poor condition, why not allow homeowners to rebuild them into triplexes that are similar size to the houses near them (within a certain % greater), or convert their existing single family detached homes into duplexes? Or allow ADU’s on larger lots?

Most owners won’t do this, so it will be slow and gentle. Why not allow homeowners to allow their properties to work for their families?

2

evergreenneedles t1_jb13p3o wrote

They tried, Walsh jung yungmann on the council cut the funding that would have created affordable units (Bc affordability requires funding interventions). They put it in contingency and the developer had to do market rate because they wouldn’t allow it to be affordable.

3