Submitted by superfakesuperfake t3_ynojgg in CambridgeMA
Donchaknow t1_ivalv67 wrote
Maybe a minority view, but I disagree with this idea. It will only contribute to more congestion on already crowded roads. The problem here is not the lights, its lack of enforcement of drivers cutting off pedestrians.
IntelligentCicada363 t1_ivbyb1d wrote
If cars were operating in a way that was safe for pedestrians, in some sort of utopia where everyone behaves nicely, it would likely congest the roads just as much as requiring no turn on red. The “lack” of congestion is caused by allowing cars to do things that are statistically proven to be unsafe for pedestrians.
Donchaknow t1_ivdfvpp wrote
Maybe if every right turn on red involved pedestrians crossing then perhaps the congestion would be the same regardless of what enforcemment mechanism used, but that premise is pretty clearly false. More broadly, there are numerous street designs within and immediately adjacent to cambridge that require drivers to use careful judgement, often while being in motion, so why would we deprive drivers the ability to use that discretion here?
IntelligentCicada363 t1_ivjnb9y wrote
Because drivers have proven themselves to be incapable of discretion
Mountain_Resolve1407 t1_ivt1rfy wrote
What statistics?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments