Submitted by stannenb t3_11t4od9 in CambridgeMA
stannenb OP t1_jdexvoo wrote
Reply to comment by cptninc in Cambridge Unveils Report on Municipal Broadband Feasibility and Business Model Options by stannenb
And the residents pay for it with their subscription fees.
You can't wish the cost away. And, as you say, the cable franchise fee, is just rounding error. It can't be both a rounding error and critical part of Verizon's decision making.
cptninc t1_jdf2w6h wrote
Verizon charges fees that are the same as what's in the proposal. Same monthly price but without the city making a $194MM spend.
One of the many reasons Verizon is able to match that rate is because it would cost them significantly less than $194MM to build out their network due to their existing infrastructure in the city.
stannenb OP t1_jdfzjw2 wrote
Then why haven't they done it already? Oh, that's right, the rounding error.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments