Submitted by frontyer0077 t3_y5g0ve in BuyItForLife
Comments
sjitz t1_isjdrj9 wrote
Will Snapchat be around when I'm 80?
[deleted] t1_isjdx4g wrote
[removed]
sjitz t1_isje4n4 wrote
A pic must be a snap, a snap must be a dick, where this gonna go next?
scurvy4all t1_isjgamn wrote
This photo should definitely be on r/wtf
Anomia_Flame t1_isjk5qp wrote
Sounds like your already are
MySweetUsername t1_isjmd0c wrote
Where can you buy film and get it developed?
nonitoni t1_isjnl5c wrote
In US, Walmart still sells 35mm and most of the popular pharmacies still develop.
siler7 t1_isjpttu wrote
He used a mirror, silly.
IKnewThisYearsAgo t1_isjucql wrote
The most likely thing to deteriorate on an old camera is the performance/accuracy of the shutter. It would be interesting to see how good the accuracy and repeatability is after 50+ years. You can buy a tester for $49.
You might not notice that it has drifted over time, because film has good latitude, and the exposure on old equipment is fairly imprecise anyway.
JackOfAllHobbies3 t1_isjugml wrote
It's film. Only recently, did professional digital cameras get more detail that the same size film. Scans of film can pretty easily get to 24 MP. Their dynamic range can also be hard for digital do match.
Firestarman t1_isjv7yh wrote
Most major cities have at least one photo lab, pharmacies aren't recomended because they will not return your negatives.
nonitoni t1_isjwl1y wrote
Aw, that's super lame.
alecmars7 t1_isjxhlt wrote
loooool. yes I am aware of this. It was a joke. But thank you for giving a nice response instead of just down voting!
ghostly_shark t1_isjxpii wrote
speak for yourself 😳
Tobias---Funke t1_isjzbzr wrote
I have a Yashica that my friend gave me 20 years ago!
edcculus t1_isk0jcu wrote
Depends. A lot of people still using analog cameras shoot black and white and develop at home. I personally even have a darkroom where I can make prints with an enlarger. Home developing black and white film is super simple. I have to buy it online.
For C-41 fim (most color film), there are places that still develop, Walgreens, Costco etc, however I believe they just send it off to a larger lab that processes all the film. I personally found a lab that I like that I send my color film to. They process and scan my color film for a great price. You can buy cheap color film like Kodak Gold at a drug store like Walgreens, or even Walmart. I use more specialty color film like Portra and some other “professional” color films, so I also buy those online.
edcculus t1_isk0uyj wrote
And I don’t think any digital camera will ever rival the detail I can get out of a high quality scan of Medium Format film. I’m usually shooting 6x9 format on a Mamiya RB 67
Edit- what’s up with the downvotes- what I said is true.
dangerouspeyote t1_isk2c6e wrote
I've got a Pentax k1000 from the 70's that also works perfectly. And bonus, if I don't have a hammer handy, I can just use the camera.
Vibro-Champ1972 t1_isk62zj wrote
I have a TL-Electro of about the same vintage. Bought it used at a pawn shop in 1983 or so. Tried selling it, giving it away, but it always comes back home. Decided to take advantage of the current trend back towards analogue processes and am pleased to report that, after installing a new battery, it works as well as ever! Why, oh why, did I give it up for a Leica? :)
SwissMargiela t1_isk8h1l wrote
Lol reminds of that thread where people kept asking a dude how he took pictures of him taking pictures and he ended up using like 8 cameras
ZippySLC t1_iski8ku wrote
That and the light seals.
rPZeJUV2R4JMRpArp t1_iskjyv3 wrote
Can you put the brand/name/etc in the post or comments so these things become searchable by google (or reddit) when I go to find a nice quality vintage camera?
ZippySLC t1_iskkgib wrote
Film is having a resurgence, but unfortunately ever since the pandemic prices have been getting pretty crazy.
Personally my favorite place to buy film is Freestyle Photo, but you can also buy it at places like B&H and Adorama. As others said, you can also buy more "consumer" oriented film like Kodak Gold at Walgreens, Target, Walmart, etc.
If you shoot black and white then developing your own negatives isn't too hard, although you'll still need to scan them. If you do color, well - some people develop at home but I think the majority mail their film out to a lab. About 7 years ago I was lucky enough to work down the street from a lab that still did film developing, but now I just send film out in the mail.
If you're asking because you're interested in maybe trying out some film photography, a camera like the one OP posted, a Pentax K1000 (what I started with), or a Canon AE-1 are good reasonably inexpensive places to start. A lot of times you should be able to find them paired up with a 50mm lens which is sort of the "standard lens" for general use.
Check out /r/analog too.
hiacbanks t1_iskm0u8 wrote
I thought costco stop
ChunkyLaFunga t1_isknlnt wrote
> they will not return your negatives.
What?!? Why not?
mikefitzvw t1_iskqtzk wrote
I buy film online and mail it to a shop and they mail my photos and negatives back. It's not the quickest process but I'm willing to be patient.
drive2fast t1_iskura4 wrote
His cell phone camera.
Can’t find a place willing to process film anymore. But I SWEAR the camera still works!
piliogree t1_isl5mqa wrote
do you ever think about your brain?
if yes, how?
markydsade t1_islgb7o wrote
Black and White chemical photography is not difficult to do but is longer to master. Finding the film, chemicals, and developer chemicals is getting more difficult and more expensive.
As someone who grew up developing and printing my own photos I know the appeal, particularly in the ability to create larger prints for display. Color chemical photography was too complex and expensive for me even back in the day.
VictorNoergaard t1_islnhlo wrote
Anal OG community? Sounds interesting..
answerguru t1_islr044 wrote
Since when do they not return negatives?
Firestarman t1_isls4o0 wrote
Since they outsourced it and stopped developing and scanning in store. So, probably in the mid nineties.
proverbialbunny t1_ism14t2 wrote
Most drug store chains in the US still develop film like they did before digital. It's just expensive. If you're looking to make it a hobby I recommend developing it yourself.
BostonGuy84 t1_ism42gn wrote
What are you using for a battery?
GoryRamsy t1_ism4h91 wrote
And in these comments…
sdp1981 t1_ismaw7x wrote
Well I didn't before now. . .
ba123blitz t1_ismc9iy wrote
While agree it is nice for others to be able to find this thread, in your case you’re already here so why not just save the post?
jaymz668 t1_ismexzr wrote
yep, early 2021 they stopped
jaymz668 t1_ismf3zz wrote
a few years now and they take weeks to get the photos back
edcculus t1_ismgxsu wrote
Didn’t know that, but I also haven’t used them since 2018.
edcculus t1_ismi2nf wrote
Features like Wi-Fi, video, no. But only the most expensive digital cameras are JUST getting to have the same quality as a 35mm film negative. Obviously quality scanning is a must as well.
lurkinislife t1_ismks6c wrote
My grandfather had that same camera and would take amazing black and white photos with it.
He was a stinky pile of human trash, but in retrospect Im surprised he would let me fiddle with it so much.
All the knobs, shutters, and what not made awesome noises.
Epsilon748 t1_ismswfc wrote
C-41 at home isn't much harder than black and white. You just have to watch temperature and time more closely. I did it at home pre-covid when I was still travelling and shooting a ton. I did all my development with one of those dark canisters and a dark bag and scanned in the negatives on my flatbed scanner.
OptimalWrongdoer8 t1_ismtmay wrote
Brings back memories. I had one in the 80s, brought it to the beach and it never worked after that. Repair shop couldn't fix it.
Spankh0us3 t1_ismyyq4 wrote
I have an old Yashica too but it is the twin lens reflex model - the thing is just plain beautiful. . .
Funktastic34 t1_isn1lyd wrote
Huh, TIL you can still buy film at Walmart or target. We still use our Polaroid and the only place I've found under $1/shot is amazon. I'd given up on film a while back because it was just too dang hard to find film/somewhere to develop it
Funktastic34 t1_isn1oj4 wrote
So you're saying he took the picture with his brain? Crazy times
Funktastic34 t1_isn1tww wrote
That got a good laugh out of me
Funktastic34 t1_isn1y31 wrote
He's thinking about the betterment of humanity cut him some slack
ba123blitz t1_isn37b0 wrote
I agreed it’d be nice to do for anyone else to find this thread but their comment didn’t ask for that they asked for the details and then specified “when I go to find a nice quality camera” so I suggested saving it
Funktastic34 t1_isn54j9 wrote
He speaks for humanity
takenusernametryanot t1_isndmgt wrote
> where this gonna go next?
this must be that
Where that gonna go next?
RougeCrown t1_isnvx2h wrote
But I thought the mirror is INSIDE the camera?
YonkRaccoon t1_isny0ah wrote
Depending on your circle, a dick must be "impressive" lol
Thus art and communication dies in the post office! xD
damien665 t1_isnz0xy wrote
Check the heavy seals, too.
ZippySLC t1_iso2gye wrote
As long as you have a spotter. Safety first!
Zach_ry t1_it5yqsg wrote
Not OP and I realize I'm 5 days late, but I get my film from Adorama for more specialized films, Meijer (supermarket) if I just want a basic roll to shoot. Memphis Film Lab (in Euclid, OH) is my developer of choice these days - I've also tried The Darkroom out of LA, but I wasn't super impressed with the scans (and that seems to be a common sentiment).
Personal_Discount453 t1_itajt2g wrote
Arrgh! I had a Yashika TL Electro-X that I bought new in the early 70's. Had it for about 8 years. Some creep climbed up to my apartment window, slit the screen, and took my camera and my PIGGYBANK! Still makes my blood boil!
frontyer0077 OP t1_ithwh8v wrote
It uses a LR44 battery I believe, but that is only to power the light meter. So not needed to take pictures. The camera is fully mechanical otherwise.
BostonGuy84 t1_ithxwl7 wrote
Awesome! Thanks! I’ve had one kicking around for awhile and always thought it needed a battery to function!
[deleted] t1_isjdcbh wrote
[removed]