Submitted by hotdigitalart t3_ycu5xx in Art
Comments
Ketchuplube t1_itp1dn5 wrote
Controversial opinion for this sub apparently, but I 100% agree. There's a difference between drawing the human figure and drawing straight up porn. Alot of the art here crosses that line.
[deleted] t1_itp4ajw wrote
[removed]
dangerroo_2 t1_itp878v wrote
Indeed. The female form is beautifully curved and formed, but if nothing else drawing a girl with her fanny in the air tends to disrupt those lines somewhat, as well as just being downright tawdry.
[deleted] t1_itppgsz wrote
[removed]
FarradayL t1_itp7bol wrote
This isn't porn.
NoAvailableImage t1_itpg2fl wrote
FarradayL t1_itplpjc wrote
I'm not going to register just to view this one image. But I'm not taking your word for it.
Ketchuplube t1_itq6vtb wrote
If you have a set of eyeballs you can tell that the image is the same, the only comment is horrendous too
FarradayL t1_itqannq wrote
Not porn and you're nothing more than a puritan.
Ketchuplube t1_itqaug6 wrote
How does not liking straight up porn on a subreddit meant for art make me a puritan?
ReasonableWrangler36 t1_itpo88x wrote
Maybe there should be a tag as porn also.
nocturnefarts t1_itpogv3 wrote
This is becoming a weeb art sub for horny teens
Ketchuplube t1_itrk9e8 wrote
I also just realized the guy who posted this has the username "hotdigitalart" which makes this even worse
FarradayL t1_itp7aya wrote
This isn't porn, you puritan lunatic.
Not_Insightful t1_itpc5qr wrote
It is literally cropped porn lmao
mushroom4two t1_itq0cnp wrote
Oh for crying out loud!
There are no "private bits" being shown here. You'll see more than that on a woman wearing a bikini at the beach, he'll you might even see more than that on Tiktok.
Art is art, telling people what it is supposed to be is the only thing inappropriate about it...
Not_Insightful t1_its2hkq wrote
?
Click the link man, it’s her full back-side exposed. I don’t care if it’s posted here, art is art and the people decide, but it is literally just cropped porn. I was replying to someone saying it isn’t porn.
mushroom4two t1_itsah8i wrote
It doesn't matter, the picture doesn't appear to break any rules and it is properly marked as NSFW.
Take it up with the mods if its that important to you.
Not_Insightful t1_ittp62u wrote
I think you’ve confused who you’re replying to. I don’t give a shit if it’s posted here. It’s dumb to pretend it isn’t porn though.
mushroom4two t1_ittztzz wrote
Time for you to move on guy.
Not_Insightful t1_itu0k5q wrote
??? You’re the one replying to me? I didn’t start this with you lmao
mushroom4two t1_itu1qlf wrote
Move on, last time.
Not_Insightful t1_itua2ou wrote
lmao
FarradayL t1_itpi693 wrote
I'm not going to register just to view this one image. But I'm not taking your word for it.
joseaof t1_itpxnkm wrote
"I can't prove you're wrong, but I refuse to admit it"
FarradayL t1_itq06ho wrote
Link to the image directly and I'll explain to you why you're a puritan lunatic.
Not_Insightful t1_its2nqv wrote
I literally did lmao
FarradayL t1_ittdfc2 wrote
It's blurred out and I have to register. Stop being dense. Oh, and go look at real porn. It might help.
Lets_Bust_Together t1_itrtdp4 wrote
This post doesn’t even have nudity and you’re still complaining?
nocturnefarts t1_itpoo53 wrote
Surely, there is an erotic art sub on Reddit
you_should_be_vegan t1_itqyx3c wrote
This sub infested with porn now, alas
[deleted] t1_itpf1nn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itoubl0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itrchyf wrote
[removed]
Sion_of_War t1_itrqsg4 wrote
i would look at your eyes bit they are just so tiny compared to that massive smile
[deleted] t1_iufnojg wrote
[removed]
Chloe-the- t1_itskxbz wrote
Nothing artistic with porn
esotericenema t1_itpryst wrote
In my personal opinion, this is art, and it's undeniably pretty dang good. It's also absolutely NSFW. Butt... excuse me... but... is it "porn"? That's a harder question to answer. In my personal opinion, regardless of how you want to define "porn," erotic art crosses a line and becomes definitely, unacceptably obscene when it depicts real people having real intercourse; not even because it's "porn" at that point, but because at that point it's literally a form of "public prostitution." And I personally intuitively feel there's something uniquely bad for the human brain/mind/spirit/soul about that. I don't think erotic renaissance statues, for example, really have exactly the same negative effect on us as actual video footage of people actually copulating. I don't even think it has the same effect when they are merely pretending to copulate and not even really doing it, like in a pg-13 movie. I don't know why... like I said... just something I deeply intuit.
Beatrix_Kiddo_ t1_itoxu4c wrote
Really wish there was a way to block the straight up porn "art" on this sub without having to block everything that's NSFW. Getting sick of these types of posts.